Standard & Poor's tells us why:
"We believe that the administratioin and Legislature will diligently work toYou can find the entire statement on the S&P Web site, if you're willing to register. They reaffirmed the state's basic credit rating (good spending habits), but gave the municipal bonds guaranteed on the state's good name a negative rating. Why? Well, let's say your wife's brother Earl cuts back on his hours at work by one-fourth, but wants to borrow a little cash to help build a new garage...
solve the gap in a structurally balanced manner and past evidence supports this
belief. However, the magnitude of the deficit, political uncertainty, and
uncertainty regarding the timing, volatility, and initial collection
possibilities associated with any replacement revenues cloud the likelihood of a
true and timely structural solution."
A quick breeze through the usual Web sites failed to turn up how our local representatives -- Caul, Cropsey, Hummel, Goschka, McManus, or Moore -- voted.
No comments:
Post a Comment